<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 243 - CESTAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330859</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, allowed the appeal in a case concerning a service tax demand and penalty waiver. The appellant rectified the short payment of service tax before the Adjudication Order, demonstrating good faith belief in proper record-keeping. The Tribunal waived the penalty under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, invoking Section 80, and upheld the payment of the short paid service tax with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 243 - CESTAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330859</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, allowed the appeal in a case concerning a service tax demand and penalty waiver. The appellant rectified the short payment of service tax before the Adjudication Order, demonstrating good faith belief in proper record-keeping. The Tribunal waived the penalty under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, invoking Section 80, and upheld the payment of the short paid service tax with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>