https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330854 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 25 for delayed excise duty payment. The judgment emphasized the legality of utilizing Cenvat credit during the default period and highlighted the importance of legal precedents in determining the applicability of penalties in excise duty cases. en-us Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330854 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 25 for delayed excise duty payment. The judgment emphasized the legality of utilizing Cenvat credit during the default period and highlighted the importance of legal precedents in determining the applicability of penalties in excise duty cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330854