<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 237 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330853</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed based on the High Court judgment favoring the appellant, overturning the order confirming a CENVAT Credit demand of Rs. 1,53,38,727 along with interest and penalties due to failure to reverse credit on exempt final products when tractors became fully exempt from Central Excise duty. The Tribunal emphasized that no correlation between raw materials and final products is required for taking credit and clarified that no credit can be taken for inputs received after the final goods become exempt from duty. The Tribunal acknowledged the correctness of the established legal position and set aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 14:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 237 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330853</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed based on the High Court judgment favoring the appellant, overturning the order confirming a CENVAT Credit demand of Rs. 1,53,38,727 along with interest and penalties due to failure to reverse credit on exempt final products when tractors became fully exempt from Central Excise duty. The Tribunal emphasized that no correlation between raw materials and final products is required for taking credit and clarified that no credit can be taken for inputs received after the final goods become exempt from duty. The Tribunal acknowledged the correctness of the established legal position and set aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>