https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330851 The Tribunal remanded the case concerning the rejection of a refund claim and recovery of an erroneous refund due to unjust enrichment concerns. The appellant's appeal was based on the failure to provide sufficient credit notes to prove that the duty amount was not passed on to buyers. The Tribunal emphasized the need for complete documentation and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing verification of all credit notes to decide the refund claim within three months. The recovery appeal was also remanded for a decision following the refund claim adjudication, granting the appellant a fair opportunity for a personal hearing and document submission. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330851 The Tribunal remanded the case concerning the rejection of a refund claim and recovery of an erroneous refund due to unjust enrichment concerns. The appellant's appeal was based on the failure to provide sufficient credit notes to prove that the duty amount was not passed on to buyers. The Tribunal emphasized the need for complete documentation and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing verification of all credit notes to decide the refund claim within three months. The recovery appeal was also remanded for a decision following the refund claim adjudication, granting the appellant a fair opportunity for a personal hearing and document submission. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330851