<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 207 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330823</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271AAA, stating that the assessee substantially complied with the requirements and the voluntary disclosure sufficed without specific questioning. The conditions under Section 271AAA(2)(ii) were considered met, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:50:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 207 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330823</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271AAA, stating that the assessee substantially complied with the requirements and the voluntary disclosure sufficed without specific questioning. The conditions under Section 271AAA(2)(ii) were considered met, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>