<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 203 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330819</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the rental income from letting out business assets should be classified as business income, not income from house property. The decision was based on the interpretation of applicable case laws and the specific facts of the case, leading to the allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 203 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330819</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the rental income from letting out business assets should be classified as business income, not income from house property. The decision was based on the interpretation of applicable case laws and the specific facts of the case, leading to the allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>