https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330817 Clearance of inputs to a 100% EOU against CT-3 certificates was treated as an export-type clearance, so the removal-as-such provision under the Cenvat Credit Rules did not require reversal of credit already taken. The Tribunal relied on the settled view that such supplies to a 100% EOU are not ordinary domestic removals for denial of credit, and therefore the demand for reversal was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330817 Clearance of inputs to a 100% EOU against CT-3 certificates was treated as an export-type clearance, so the removal-as-such provision under the Cenvat Credit Rules did not require reversal of credit already taken. The Tribunal relied on the settled view that such supplies to a 100% EOU are not ordinary domestic removals for denial of credit, and therefore the demand for reversal was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330817