<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 182 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4403</link>
    <description>Service tax had already been paid before the show cause notice, and the Tribunal noted prima facie that service tax was not leviable on services rendered outside India. It also relied on the Board circular supporting the assessee&#039;s position. On those facts, the penalty demand did not justify insistence on pre-deposit at the interim stage, so waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the penalty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 182 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4403</link>
      <description>Service tax had already been paid before the show cause notice, and the Tribunal noted prima facie that service tax was not leviable on services rendered outside India. It also relied on the Board circular supporting the assessee&#039;s position. On those facts, the penalty demand did not justify insistence on pre-deposit at the interim stage, so waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the penalty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>