<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 187 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330803</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI ruled in favor of the appellant, granting relief under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, in a case involving a penalty imposed under section 78 due to confusion regarding the inclusion of tax deducted at source (TDS) in taxable services. The Tribunal found no deliberate intent to harm the Revenue, relieving the appellant from penal consequences under section 78 but requiring payment of interest for the default period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:35:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 187 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330803</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI ruled in favor of the appellant, granting relief under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, in a case involving a penalty imposed under section 78 due to confusion regarding the inclusion of tax deducted at source (TDS) in taxable services. The Tribunal found no deliberate intent to harm the Revenue, relieving the appellant from penal consequences under section 78 but requiring payment of interest for the default period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>