<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 181 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330797</link>
    <description>The judgment clarified the interpretation of interest on warehoused goods, the applicability of section 72 in exemption cases, and the impact of possessing an EPCG license on clearance. The decision favored the appellant, ruling that no interest is recoverable based on the specific circumstances and legal principles established in previous cases, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 181 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330797</link>
      <description>The judgment clarified the interpretation of interest on warehoused goods, the applicability of section 72 in exemption cases, and the impact of possessing an EPCG license on clearance. The decision favored the appellant, ruling that no interest is recoverable based on the specific circumstances and legal principles established in previous cases, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>