https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330790 An assessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act was not interfered with on the ground of denial of hearing because the assessee had appeared in person, made a substantive admission on the purchase discrepancy, and sought reconsideration rather than showing any real prejudice from the absence of another hearing. The existence of an alternate statutory appellate remedy also weighed against writ intervention, especially because no jurisdictional error or patent illegality was demonstrated. The natural justice challenge was therefore rejected, and the assessee was left to pursue the statutory remedy. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:27:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330790 An assessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act was not interfered with on the ground of denial of hearing because the assessee had appeared in person, made a substantive admission on the purchase discrepancy, and sought reconsideration rather than showing any real prejudice from the absence of another hearing. The existence of an alternate statutory appellate remedy also weighed against writ intervention, especially because no jurisdictional error or patent illegality was demonstrated. The natural justice challenge was therefore rejected, and the assessee was left to pursue the statutory remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330790