<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 164 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330780</link>
    <description>The Court partially favored the Revenue in the case, agreeing that the Tribunal erred in its interpretation regarding buildings but upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on agricultural land and trees. The Court allowed the respondent to present evidence of tax payments made by compensation recipients to avoid double taxation. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 164 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330780</link>
      <description>The Court partially favored the Revenue in the case, agreeing that the Tribunal erred in its interpretation regarding buildings but upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on agricultural land and trees. The Court allowed the respondent to present evidence of tax payments made by compensation recipients to avoid double taxation. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>