<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 153 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330769</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, considering the debatable nature of the issue, the appellant&#039;s full disclosures, and the lack of deliberate concealment or inaccurate particulars. The decision was based on the assessment of the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal, emphasizing the absence of malafide intent on the part of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:15:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 153 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330769</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, considering the debatable nature of the issue, the appellant&#039;s full disclosures, and the lack of deliberate concealment or inaccurate particulars. The decision was based on the assessment of the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal, emphasizing the absence of malafide intent on the part of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>