https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185272 A delay in refiling objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 may be condoned only on a specific and credible showing of sufficient cause. Where the refiling delay substantially defeats the statutory time scheme, the Court applies stricter scrutiny and will not adopt an unrestricted liberal approach. On the facts described, the explanation that papers were misplaced and later found was unsupported by particulars or affidavits from the persons said to be responsible, and the delay was treated as careless and negligent rather than diligent; condonation was refused. en-us Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Aug 2016 16:54:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185272 A delay in refiling objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 may be condoned only on a specific and credible showing of sufficient cause. Where the refiling delay substantially defeats the statutory time scheme, the Court applies stricter scrutiny and will not adopt an unrestricted liberal approach. On the facts described, the explanation that papers were misplaced and later found was unsupported by particulars or affidavits from the persons said to be responsible, and the delay was treated as careless and negligent rather than diligent; condonation was refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185272