https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185263 A search and seizure carried out under a magistrate-issued warrant is not ordinarily amenable to challenge in writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The Court noted that the petitioners did not assail the warrant before the competent court, and that objections concerning the legality of the search or compliance with criminal procedure are for the criminal court to examine. An alleged illegality in the search does not, by itself, invalidate the seizure or justify collateral writ interference. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable and the challenge to the search and seizure failed. en-us Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Aug 2016 16:36:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185263 A search and seizure carried out under a magistrate-issued warrant is not ordinarily amenable to challenge in writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The Court noted that the petitioners did not assail the warrant before the competent court, and that objections concerning the legality of the search or compliance with criminal procedure are for the criminal court to examine. An alleged illegality in the search does not, by itself, invalidate the seizure or justify collateral writ interference. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable and the challenge to the search and seizure failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185263