https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185259 A belated writ challenge to land acquisition proceedings was held barred by gross delay, laches, acquiescence, and waiver. The Court noted that the petitioners had prior knowledge of the planning and acquisition process through published notices, had participated by seeking compensation and filing for enhanced compensation, and filed the writ only after the award, possession, compensation treatment, and vesting of the land had been completed. On those facts, the challenge was rejected and the dismissal was upheld. en-us Fri, 06 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:03:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185259 A belated writ challenge to land acquisition proceedings was held barred by gross delay, laches, acquiescence, and waiver. The Court noted that the petitioners had prior knowledge of the planning and acquisition process through published notices, had participated by seeking compensation and filing for enhanced compensation, and filed the writ only after the award, possession, compensation treatment, and vesting of the land had been completed. On those facts, the challenge was rejected and the dismissal was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185259