https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185254 Teachers allowed to continue beyond superannuation under the Kerala Education Rules were held entitled to pay revision during the extended period, because the service rules expressly denied only increment and promotion. The commentary treats "increment" as a distinct concept from revision of pay scale and states that a plain rule cannot be expanded by invoking casus omissus to add a restriction that is not expressed. Pay revision could not, therefore, be excluded merely because the teacher had crossed the retirement date, and the State's challenge failed. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Aug 2016 14:30:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185254 Teachers allowed to continue beyond superannuation under the Kerala Education Rules were held entitled to pay revision during the extended period, because the service rules expressly denied only increment and promotion. The commentary treats "increment" as a distinct concept from revision of pay scale and states that a plain rule cannot be expanded by invoking casus omissus to add a restriction that is not expressed. Pay revision could not, therefore, be excluded merely because the teacher had crossed the retirement date, and the State's challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185254