https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185251 Section 5A objections in land acquisition are a substantive safeguard, but the challenge failed where the Collector held the inquiry, considered the objections, and excluded part of the notified land, showing that the objections were not ignored. The complaint was also weakened by the appellants' acquiescence, as they allowed the acquisition to proceed after the Section 6 declaration and raised the challenge only after the award. The request to exempt agricultural lands from acquisition was rejected because the lands formed part of a larger industrial acquisition and no justifiable ground was shown to carve them out. The acquisition was upheld. en-us Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:11:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185251 Section 5A objections in land acquisition are a substantive safeguard, but the challenge failed where the Collector held the inquiry, considered the objections, and excluded part of the notified land, showing that the objections were not ignored. The complaint was also weakened by the appellants' acquiescence, as they allowed the acquisition to proceed after the Section 6 declaration and raised the challenge only after the award. The request to exempt agricultural lands from acquisition was rejected because the lands formed part of a larger industrial acquisition and no justifiable ground was shown to carve them out. The acquisition was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185251