https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185248 The Supreme Court upheld the umpire's award, reinstating the sum awarded to the appellant for reimbursement of the sub-contractor's tax liability under Clause 17.3 of the General Conditions of Contract. The Court found the umpire's interpretation of the clause to be reasonable and within his jurisdiction, emphasizing that the High Court erred in interfering with the award. The appeal was allowed, and the arbitration petition by the respondent to set aside the award was dismissed with costs. en-us Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Aug 2023 12:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185248 The Supreme Court upheld the umpire's award, reinstating the sum awarded to the appellant for reimbursement of the sub-contractor's tax liability under Clause 17.3 of the General Conditions of Contract. The Court found the umpire's interpretation of the clause to be reasonable and within his jurisdiction, emphasizing that the High Court erred in interfering with the award. The appeal was allowed, and the arbitration petition by the respondent to set aside the award was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185248