<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 194 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4393</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the order granting the refund of excess Service Tax to the respondent due to lack of clear reasoning. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for a detailed review and a speaking order. The Commissioner was directed to provide the respondent with a personal hearing before making any decision, highlighting the significance of a well-reasoned decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 194 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4393</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the order granting the refund of excess Service Tax to the respondent due to lack of clear reasoning. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for a detailed review and a speaking order. The Commissioner was directed to provide the respondent with a personal hearing before making any decision, highlighting the significance of a well-reasoned decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>