<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (2) TMI 306 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185240</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeals, ruling that the appellants were not entitled to common seniority with Directorate employees. It held that the differentiation between the two cadres was reasonable and not arbitrary, thus not violating Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 16:40:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (2) TMI 306 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185240</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeals, ruling that the appellants were not entitled to common seniority with Directorate employees. It held that the differentiation between the two cadres was reasonable and not arbitrary, thus not violating Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>