https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185238 In certiorari review, a High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or replace a disciplinary authority's factual finding unless it is unsupported by evidence or perverse; the finding on the first charge was therefore restored. A direction restricting meetings within railway premises was held to regulate the place of assembly and not to infringe the freedoms of speech, assembly or association, because those rights do not include a right to use another's property as of course. Where a disciplinary order rests on multiple grounds, the punishment remains sustainable if one valid ground independently supports it; the penalty was upheld on the basis of the serious first charge. en-us Tue, 04 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Aug 2016 15:53:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185238 In certiorari review, a High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or replace a disciplinary authority's factual finding unless it is unsupported by evidence or perverse; the finding on the first charge was therefore restored. A direction restricting meetings within railway premises was held to regulate the place of assembly and not to infringe the freedoms of speech, assembly or association, because those rights do not include a right to use another's property as of course. Where a disciplinary order rests on multiple grounds, the punishment remains sustainable if one valid ground independently supports it; the penalty was upheld on the basis of the serious first charge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185238