<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 193 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the lower authority for reconsideration. The penalty enhancement imposed on the appellant under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, was set aside due to incorrect calculation of the delay in service tax payment. The decision emphasized the importance of accurate factual assessment in determining penalties and the need for precise data review before enhancing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 193 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the lower authority for reconsideration. The penalty enhancement imposed on the appellant under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, was set aside due to incorrect calculation of the delay in service tax payment. The decision emphasized the importance of accurate factual assessment in determining penalties and the need for precise data review before enhancing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>