<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (3) TMI 54 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185227</link>
    <description>A domestic enquiry is not a judicial proceeding, and a workman has no legal right to insist on representation by a union representative; the employer may allow assistance, but fairness does not require it. Dismissal is also not invalid merely because the enquiry or order contains an incidental reference to misconduct not separately set out in the charge-sheet, or an obvious clerical misdescription, where the punishment is in substance based on charges properly framed and proved. On that basis, the dismissal of the workmen was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 14:26:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (3) TMI 54 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185227</link>
      <description>A domestic enquiry is not a judicial proceeding, and a workman has no legal right to insist on representation by a union representative; the employer may allow assistance, but fairness does not require it. Dismissal is also not invalid merely because the enquiry or order contains an incidental reference to misconduct not separately set out in the charge-sheet, or an obvious clerical misdescription, where the punishment is in substance based on charges properly framed and proved. On that basis, the dismissal of the workmen was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>