<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 228 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reduce penalties imposed under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the respondents. The Tribunal emphasized the discretionary power of the Commissioner to reduce penalties and highlighted the provision for waiving penalties under section 80 of the Act. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that the reduction of penalties was justified based on the facts of the case and legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 228 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reduce penalties imposed under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the respondents. The Tribunal emphasized the discretionary power of the Commissioner to reduce penalties and highlighted the provision for waiving penalties under section 80 of the Act. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that the reduction of penalties was justified based on the facts of the case and legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>