<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 148 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330764</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered the appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 35 Lakhs within eight weeks, staying the recovery of the remaining adjudicated tax, interest, and penalty pending appeal disposal. The decision was based on finding that the appellant provided taxable services to Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd., rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments against taxability and non-receipt of consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the need for further examination of services&#039; nature and classification during the final appeal disposal but concluded that a full waiver of the adjudicated dues was not warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 14:06:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 148 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330764</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered the appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 35 Lakhs within eight weeks, staying the recovery of the remaining adjudicated tax, interest, and penalty pending appeal disposal. The decision was based on finding that the appellant provided taxable services to Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd., rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments against taxability and non-receipt of consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the need for further examination of services&#039; nature and classification during the final appeal disposal but concluded that a full waiver of the adjudicated dues was not warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>