<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 145 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that services provided by overseas entities for packages booked in India were not liable to service tax under section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of categorizing services accurately under the Taxation of Service Rules to determine tax liability correctly. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 145 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that services provided by overseas entities for packages booked in India were not liable to service tax under section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of categorizing services accurately under the Taxation of Service Rules to determine tax liability correctly. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>