https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330758 The Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the penalty order, and remanded the matter for further review of the petitioner's bonafides regarding Bank Guarantee encashment for duty payment to avail amnesty benefits under Public Notice No.22. The Court emphasized the petitioner's timely actions and genuine intent to comply with obligations, directing the appellate authority to reassess the petitioner's case. The decision highlighted the significance of complying with directives and timelines for eligibility for amnesty benefits, underscoring the importance of proactive steps in fulfilling obligations. en-us Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330758 The Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the penalty order, and remanded the matter for further review of the petitioner's bonafides regarding Bank Guarantee encashment for duty payment to avail amnesty benefits under Public Notice No.22. The Court emphasized the petitioner's timely actions and genuine intent to comply with obligations, directing the appellate authority to reassess the petitioner's case. The decision highlighted the significance of complying with directives and timelines for eligibility for amnesty benefits, underscoring the importance of proactive steps in fulfilling obligations. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330758