<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 141 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330757</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a dispute over the assessable value of imported printing machines. It criticized the rejection of the invoice value and reliance on internet search for valuation, emphasizing the lack of legal merit in the decision. The Tribunal highlighted the necessity of following legal provisions for valuation and dismissed the use of internet information for enhancing value. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the original order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of proper valuation methods in customs cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 141 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330757</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a dispute over the assessable value of imported printing machines. It criticized the rejection of the invoice value and reliance on internet search for valuation, emphasizing the lack of legal merit in the decision. The Tribunal highlighted the necessity of following legal provisions for valuation and dismissed the use of internet information for enhancing value. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the original order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of proper valuation methods in customs cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>