https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330756 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Geo Cargo Express and rejected the Revenue's appeal. The impugned order forfeiting a portion of the security deposit was set aside due to violations of time limits under the Customs House Agent Licensing Regulations, rendering the actions without jurisdiction. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of these time limits, leading to the decision that the order could not be sustained solely based on this ground. The judgment was delivered on 27.07.2016 by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI. en-us Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Aug 2016 11:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330756 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Geo Cargo Express and rejected the Revenue's appeal. The impugned order forfeiting a portion of the security deposit was set aside due to violations of time limits under the Customs House Agent Licensing Regulations, rendering the actions without jurisdiction. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of these time limits, leading to the decision that the order could not be sustained solely based on this ground. The judgment was delivered on 27.07.2016 by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330756