https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330752 At the stage of entertaining the second appeal, the High Court confined itself to the pre-deposit issue and did not examine the reassessment merits. It directed the petitioner to produce proof of the claimed prior payment before the Tribunal. If that payment, or any part of it, was established, the Tribunal was to verify it and require deposit of the balance so that the total pre-deposit reached the demanded amount. The appellate forum was then to consider the second appeal in accordance with law, leaving the tax dispute itself undecided. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Aug 2016 13:57:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330752 At the stage of entertaining the second appeal, the High Court confined itself to the pre-deposit issue and did not examine the reassessment merits. It directed the petitioner to produce proof of the claimed prior payment before the Tribunal. If that payment, or any part of it, was established, the Tribunal was to verify it and require deposit of the balance so that the total pre-deposit reached the demanded amount. The appellate forum was then to consider the second appeal in accordance with law, leaving the tax dispute itself undecided. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330752