<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 135 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330751</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the seizure of goods at the U.P. border due to the absence of Form - 38, finding the initial lack of proper documentation indicated an attempt to evade tax payment. The revisionist&#039;s arguments regarding &quot;no mans land&quot; seizures and the submission of Form - 38 were deemed insufficient to overturn the seizure order. The Court emphasized statutory authority for seizures throughout the state and confirmed penalty proceedings for one consignment while dropping them for another, ultimately dismissing the revision and affirming the validity of the seizure order and the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 13:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 135 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330751</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the seizure of goods at the U.P. border due to the absence of Form - 38, finding the initial lack of proper documentation indicated an attempt to evade tax payment. The revisionist&#039;s arguments regarding &quot;no mans land&quot; seizures and the submission of Form - 38 were deemed insufficient to overturn the seizure order. The Court emphasized statutory authority for seizures throughout the state and confirmed penalty proceedings for one consignment while dropping them for another, ultimately dismissing the revision and affirming the validity of the seizure order and the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>