https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185225 An absorbed employee of an amalgamated bank remained subject to disciplinary proceedings for misconduct allegedly committed before amalgamation where the amalgamation scheme and absorption terms authorised such action. The proceedings could be conducted under the Canara Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976 because the employee accepted the governing service terms and no material difference was shown between the disciplinary frameworks. Refusal of legal representation was upheld since legal assistance was not a right on the facts, and the allegation of mala fides failed because similar enquiries had been initiated against other similarly placed officers. No ground was found for interference under Article 226. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Aug 2016 13:07:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185225 An absorbed employee of an amalgamated bank remained subject to disciplinary proceedings for misconduct allegedly committed before amalgamation where the amalgamation scheme and absorption terms authorised such action. The proceedings could be conducted under the Canara Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976 because the employee accepted the governing service terms and no material difference was shown between the disciplinary frameworks. Refusal of legal representation was upheld since legal assistance was not a right on the facts, and the allegation of mala fides failed because similar enquiries had been initiated against other similarly placed officers. No ground was found for interference under Article 226. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185225