<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 709 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185223</link>
    <description>The SC concluded that Rule 153(8) of the Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987, was constitutionally valid, overturning the Full Bench of the Andhra Pradesh HC&#039;s decision. The rule, which restricts a charge-sheeted employee from having a legal practitioner and limits the role of a friend in departmental proceedings, was challenged but ultimately upheld by the SC. The appeal was allowed, and the HC&#039;s judgment was set aside without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 709 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185223</link>
      <description>The SC concluded that Rule 153(8) of the Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987, was constitutionally valid, overturning the Full Bench of the Andhra Pradesh HC&#039;s decision. The rule, which restricts a charge-sheeted employee from having a legal practitioner and limits the role of a friend in departmental proceedings, was challenged but ultimately upheld by the SC. The appeal was allowed, and the HC&#039;s judgment was set aside without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>