<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 564 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185222</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the Karnataka HC&#039;s decision that directed management to reconsider legal representation in disciplinary proceedings. The SC clarified that there is no inherent right to legal representation unless explicitly provided by rules, and the disciplinary authority&#039;s discretion was justified given the case&#039;s circumstances and available assistance options.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 564 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185222</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the Karnataka HC&#039;s decision that directed management to reconsider legal representation in disciplinary proceedings. The SC clarified that there is no inherent right to legal representation unless explicitly provided by rules, and the disciplinary authority&#039;s discretion was justified given the case&#039;s circumstances and available assistance options.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>