https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185220 The Supreme Court held that the right to representation in disciplinary proceedings is not absolute and can be regulated by certified Standing Orders. The Court upheld the Appellate Authority's certification of the Draft Standing Orders, emphasizing that they were reasonable and aligned with the Model Standing Orders. The Court set aside the Bombay High Court's judgment and allowed the appeals, affirming the authority of the Certifying Officer and Appellate Authority in ensuring fairness and reasonableness in Standing Orders under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946. en-us Mon, 14 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Aug 2016 12:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185220 The Supreme Court held that the right to representation in disciplinary proceedings is not absolute and can be regulated by certified Standing Orders. The Court upheld the Appellate Authority's certification of the Draft Standing Orders, emphasizing that they were reasonable and aligned with the Model Standing Orders. The Court set aside the Bombay High Court's judgment and allowed the appeals, affirming the authority of the Certifying Officer and Appellate Authority in ensuring fairness and reasonableness in Standing Orders under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185220