<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 117 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330733</link>
    <description>Notification No. 14/2002-CE was construed to allow the concessional duty benefit where textile fabrics were procured from the market without duty-paying documents, because Explanation II created a deeming fiction that such yarn or fabrics would be treated as duty paid. The condition requiring appropriate duty payment had to be read harmoniously with that explanation, and the benefit was linked to non-availment of Cenvat credit rather than documentary proof of duty payment. A literal reading that excluded market-purchased grey fabrics would make the explanation redundant and create repeated duty incidence in the textile processing chain, so the demand was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 117 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330733</link>
      <description>Notification No. 14/2002-CE was construed to allow the concessional duty benefit where textile fabrics were procured from the market without duty-paying documents, because Explanation II created a deeming fiction that such yarn or fabrics would be treated as duty paid. The condition requiring appropriate duty payment had to be read harmoniously with that explanation, and the benefit was linked to non-availment of Cenvat credit rather than documentary proof of duty payment. A literal reading that excluded market-purchased grey fabrics would make the explanation redundant and create repeated duty incidence in the textile processing chain, so the demand was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>