<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 116 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330732</link>
    <description>Uncorroborated and retracted statements recorded during investigation cannot, by themselves, sustain a charge of misdeclaration in excise matters where the assessee&#039;s invoices and records remain unshaken. The allegation that cotton fabrics were polyester-dominated fabrics failed because no samples were drawn, no test report was produced, and no independent documentary evidence supported the Revenue&#039;s case. On that footing, denial of exemption from Central Excise duty was unjustified, and the demand, interest and penalties could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 116 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330732</link>
      <description>Uncorroborated and retracted statements recorded during investigation cannot, by themselves, sustain a charge of misdeclaration in excise matters where the assessee&#039;s invoices and records remain unshaken. The allegation that cotton fabrics were polyester-dominated fabrics failed because no samples were drawn, no test report was produced, and no independent documentary evidence supported the Revenue&#039;s case. On that footing, denial of exemption from Central Excise duty was unjustified, and the demand, interest and penalties could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>