<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 111 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330727</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the respondent&#039;s arguments in the challenge to the Tribunal judgment for Assessment Year 2003-2004. The Court clarified the interpretation of depreciation allowance on the original value of assets and the classification of assets for depreciation under Sec. 32 of the Income Tax Act, ruling in favor of the respondent on all three issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 11:32:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 111 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330727</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the respondent&#039;s arguments in the challenge to the Tribunal judgment for Assessment Year 2003-2004. The Court clarified the interpretation of depreciation allowance on the original value of assets and the classification of assets for depreciation under Sec. 32 of the Income Tax Act, ruling in favor of the respondent on all three issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>