<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 104 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330720</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee on all issues. It confirmed the deduction u/s.80-IA, emphasizing the presence of a manufacturing unit and compliance with tax regulations. Additionally, it supported the deletion of specific additions based on substantial evidence from late inspections. The Court also upheld the disallowance deletion concerning &#039;incentive income,&#039; noting the consistency in allowing deductions in previous years. The assessee&#039;s compliance with statutory conditions, evidence reliance by the Tribunal, and past deduction application led to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 11:32:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 104 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330720</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee on all issues. It confirmed the deduction u/s.80-IA, emphasizing the presence of a manufacturing unit and compliance with tax regulations. Additionally, it supported the deletion of specific additions based on substantial evidence from late inspections. The Court also upheld the disallowance deletion concerning &#039;incentive income,&#039; noting the consistency in allowing deductions in previous years. The assessee&#039;s compliance with statutory conditions, evidence reliance by the Tribunal, and past deduction application led to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>