<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 103 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330719</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the deletion of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c), ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Department. The decision emphasized the significance of legal interpretation in tax matters and concluded that there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 11:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 103 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330719</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the deletion of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c), ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Department. The decision emphasized the significance of legal interpretation in tax matters and concluded that there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>