<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1178 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185214</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the issue of condonation of delay in filing the appeal after considering the affidavit of the office boy. The Court stressed that unintentional delays should be viewed liberally, and if a reasonable explanation is provided, cases should be decided on merits rather than technicalities. Despite a minor discrepancy in the name, the Court favored the appellant, remanding the proceedings to the Tribunal for reconsideration. The appellant was ordered to pay a cost of 5,000 to the State Legal Service Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 10:59:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1178 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185214</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the issue of condonation of delay in filing the appeal after considering the affidavit of the office boy. The Court stressed that unintentional delays should be viewed liberally, and if a reasonable explanation is provided, cases should be decided on merits rather than technicalities. Despite a minor discrepancy in the name, the Court favored the appellant, remanding the proceedings to the Tribunal for reconsideration. The appellant was ordered to pay a cost of 5,000 to the State Legal Service Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>