https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330707 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. It held that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat Credit on the disputed input services and capital goods. The demand was also found to be barred by limitation due to the appellant's prior disclosures and the revenue's initial agreement to the appellant's eligibility for credit. en-us Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330707 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. It held that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat Credit on the disputed input services and capital goods. The demand was also found to be barred by limitation due to the appellant's prior disclosures and the revenue's initial agreement to the appellant's eligibility for credit. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330707