https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4377 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order for recovery of interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision was based on the absence of fraud or suppression of facts in the case involving remission of duty on stolen goods. The Tribunal emphasized that interest under Section 11AB applies only in cases of fraud or suppression, which were not present here. The appellant's request for remission of duty on stolen goods was upheld, and the recovery of interest was deemed unsustainable. en-us Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4377 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order for recovery of interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision was based on the absence of fraud or suppression of facts in the case involving remission of duty on stolen goods. The Tribunal emphasized that interest under Section 11AB applies only in cases of fraud or suppression, which were not present here. The appellant's request for remission of duty on stolen goods was upheld, and the recovery of interest was deemed unsustainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4377