<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 374 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185204</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declared clause (5) of Article 371-D, along with its proviso, unconstitutional and void. The State Government&#039;s power to modify or annul orders of the Administrative Tribunal was deemed subversive of justice and violative of the basic structure doctrine. The Government was directed to amend the Presidential Order accordingly, quashing all orders made under the proviso to clause (5). The Court emphasized the importance of judicial review and the efficacy of the Administrative Tribunal, providing specific directions for remand and reconsideration of affected cases. The petitions were allowed, and review petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 18:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 374 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185204</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declared clause (5) of Article 371-D, along with its proviso, unconstitutional and void. The State Government&#039;s power to modify or annul orders of the Administrative Tribunal was deemed subversive of justice and violative of the basic structure doctrine. The Government was directed to amend the Presidential Order accordingly, quashing all orders made under the proviso to clause (5). The Court emphasized the importance of judicial review and the efficacy of the Administrative Tribunal, providing specific directions for remand and reconsideration of affected cases. The petitions were allowed, and review petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>