<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1124 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185196</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of 20% of cash payments under section 40A(3) as justified, dismissing the appeal. Regarding the addition under section 68 for unexplained funds, the Tribunal found the negative balance unexplained but limited the addition to the peak negative balance, ordering only a portion to be added to the income. As a result, the appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 14:03:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1124 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185196</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of 20% of cash payments under section 40A(3) as justified, dismissing the appeal. Regarding the addition under section 68 for unexplained funds, the Tribunal found the negative balance unexplained but limited the addition to the peak negative balance, ordering only a portion to be added to the income. As a result, the appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>