<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1934 (4) TMI 14 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185190</link>
    <description>Ex parte assessment under the Income-tax Act may be made where statutory notices are not complied with, but reopening under the sufficient-cause provision depends on a judicially sound assessment of all relevant circumstances, including illness, inability to attend and any failure to communicate a clear order on an adjournment request. A best-judgment assessment must rest on reasonable material and cannot be a vague or arbitrary estimate; where circumstances require, local inquiry and recorded inquiry results are expected. On the facts discussed, sufficient cause existed for reopening, and the ex parte best-judgment assessment was not supported by adequate material and was held invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1934 (4) TMI 14 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185190</link>
      <description>Ex parte assessment under the Income-tax Act may be made where statutory notices are not complied with, but reopening under the sufficient-cause provision depends on a judicially sound assessment of all relevant circumstances, including illness, inability to attend and any failure to communicate a clear order on an adjournment request. A best-judgment assessment must rest on reasonable material and cannot be a vague or arbitrary estimate; where circumstances require, local inquiry and recorded inquiry results are expected. On the facts discussed, sufficient cause existed for reopening, and the ex parte best-judgment assessment was not supported by adequate material and was held invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>