<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 76 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330692</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the exemption under section 10(23C) (vi) of the Income Tax Act for the assessee&#039;s income, except for specific instances where disallowances were confirmed. The appeal by the Revenue challenging the exemption was partly allowed, with the Tribunal ruling that the income would continue to be exempt despite certain breaches and that there was no merit in denying exemption for specific expenses like penalty. The Tribunal also confirmed the disallowance of expenses incurred on Amrut Mahotsav, stating they were not considered for charitable purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 11:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 76 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330692</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the exemption under section 10(23C) (vi) of the Income Tax Act for the assessee&#039;s income, except for specific instances where disallowances were confirmed. The appeal by the Revenue challenging the exemption was partly allowed, with the Tribunal ruling that the income would continue to be exempt despite certain breaches and that there was no merit in denying exemption for specific expenses like penalty. The Tribunal also confirmed the disallowance of expenses incurred on Amrut Mahotsav, stating they were not considered for charitable purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>