https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330689 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to accept the sale of gold but upheld the addition concerning the sale of diamonds. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)'s order on the diamond issue due to the failure to establish the identity of the diamonds sold in the current year with those declared under the VDIS 1997 scheme. en-us Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Aug 2016 17:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330689 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to accept the sale of gold but upheld the addition concerning the sale of diamonds. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)'s order on the diamond issue due to the failure to establish the identity of the diamonds sold in the current year with those declared under the VDIS 1997 scheme. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330689