<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 72 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330688</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to correctly apply the peak credit theory by considering all transactions in the bank accounts, eliminating double taxation. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, and the AO was instructed to re-compute interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C based on the revised peak credit determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 11:07:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=437141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 72 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330688</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to correctly apply the peak credit theory by considering all transactions in the bank accounts, eliminating double taxation. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, and the AO was instructed to re-compute interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C based on the revised peak credit determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=330688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>